Jump to content


superted

Problem with supsersedence

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have a problem with supersedence. Client have win 7, office 2010, language pack and proofing tools. We want to upgrade to Office 365. Then we have to uninstall all Office 2010 products, and then install Office 365. I have used supersedence and created a device collection. This is limited to all systems, and membership rules I used direct. I have just added one client to this collection and done the office 365 deployment to this collection. Office 2010 are uninstalled and Office 365 are installed, but the problem are that other client then I have added to the collection got this application package. I don't understand why.

 

Se picture for more information.

 

I have experience the same problem on the Adobe reader 11.0.5 package I have made. This have also a supersedence. When I deploy a new maskin it have adobe reader 11.0.5 installed, but somehow it reinstall after a while. Some client it just uninstall without install again. I have just one deployment on this. It deployed to all system, but with direct rule. And I have just added some client to this collection.

Could it be some problem with the supersedence or problem with device collection?

 

Thanks for feedback

post-24289-0-01402300-1395302294_thumb.png

post-24289-0-81789000-1395302294_thumb.png

post-24289-0-40271100-1395302295_thumb.png

post-24289-0-93600500-1395302295_thumb.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me take a wild guess. Your Office 2010 is part of an optional task sequence (probably OSD). And your Adobe Reader obviously too.

If you superseed an application, which is part of an optional task sequnce, all clients of the task sequence target collection, with the superseed version installed, will get the new Version, no matter to which collection you deploy it.

Makes sense? No .. but it's the sad truth.

I actually had a ticket open with MS Support. They could'nt help us either. The bug seems to have no priority for the developers and might be fixed with a future CU.

 

I am hardly using the supersedence option anymore now, to avoid this bevahior.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.