Jump to content


Established Members
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender

SMSNewb's Achievements


Newbie (1/14)



  1. Thanks, Niall. Do you happen to know of the server impact if a full update is done on 200 collections at the same time?
  2. Or, if anyone has any input as to the impact of having a bunch of collections full update all at the same time, or the impact of a bunch of collections that use incremental updates that would also be helpful
  3. Hello, I'm attempting to create a script that will mirror my AD OU's as collections. I have everything worked out, except "Schedule a full update on this collection". Is there a way that I can easily and dynamically stagger the update schedule with scripting? I don't want 150 collections doing a full update at the same time. I also read that having all your collections set to "Use incremental updates for the collection" can be rough on performance. Anyone have any suggestions as to how to automate this while being mindful of server performance? Thanks
  4. Hello, I have an office where all the clients are no longer getting updates from SCCM SUP. The office is connected via VPN back to the main office where the MP/DP are. All clients at this office are Windows 7 Enterprise. Looking at the WUAHandler.log, I get: OnSearchComplete - Failed to end search job. Error = 0x80072efe. WUAHandler 9/6/2017 11:44:54 AM 2976 (0x0BA0) Scan failed with error = 0x80072efe. WUAHandler 9/6/2017 11:44:54 AM 2976 (0x0BA0) Looking at the WindowsUpdate.log, I get: 2017-09-06 12:29:33:171 1168 1344 Misc WARNING: Send failed with hr = 80072efe. 2017-09-06 12:29:33:171 1168 1344 Misc WARNING: SendRequest failed with hr = 80072efe. Proxy List used: <(null)> Bypass List used : <(null)> Auth Schemes used : <> 2017-09-06 12:29:33:171 1168 1344 Misc FATAL: SOAP/WinHttp - SendRequest: SendRequestUsingProxy failed. error 0x80072efe 2017-09-06 12:29:33:171 1168 1344 PT + Last proxy send request failed with hr = 0x80072EFE, HTTP status code = 0 2017-09-06 12:29:33:171 1168 1344 PT + Caller provided credentials = No 2017-09-06 12:29:33:171 1168 1344 PT + Impersonate flags = 0 2017-09-06 12:29:33:171 1168 1344 PT + Possible authorization schemes used = 2017-09-06 12:29:33:171 1168 1344 PT WARNING: GetAuthorizationCookie failure, error = 0x80072EFE, soap client error = 5, soap error code = 0, HTTP status code = 200 2017-09-06 12:29:33:171 1168 1344 PT WARNING: Failed to initialize Simple Targeting Cookie: 0x80072efe 2017-09-06 12:29:33:171 1168 1344 PT WARNING: PopulateAuthCookies failed: 0x80072efe 2017-09-06 12:29:33:171 1168 1344 PT WARNING: RefreshCookie failed: 0x80072efe 2017-09-06 12:29:33:171 1168 1344 PT WARNING: RefreshPTState failed: 0x80072efe 2017-09-06 12:29:33:171 1168 1344 PT WARNING: PTError: 0x80072efe 2017-09-06 12:29:33:171 1168 1344 Report WARNING: Reporter failed to upload events with hr = 80072efe. If I go to http://<servername>:8530, I get page can't be displayed. I can ping the SCCM server from the client. I've checked my SCCM client cert, and it is good. I can manually run updates trough Windows Updates. I've turned off the Windows Firewall to test without success. I've reinstalled the SCCM client. I'm not having this issue with any other clients, just the ones at this office. I'm kinda at a loss at this point. Does anyone have any insight as to what I can look at? Has anyone else experienced this issue? Thanks.
  5. OK, thanks simulacra75. Do I limit that distribution point with a boundary group for the IP subnet for that office to force things to that DP? The will be ~3-5 /24 networks there
  6. So, let the clients use the management point in the main building across the vpn? In what scenario would I want to add additional management points?
  7. I believe it is a 20 megabyte connection, but the ISP is terrible there and the connection is flaky and drops quite a bit.
  8. Hello, I'm looking for some best practice advise regarding adding additional management points. Currently, I have a single SCCM server for all my roles. I only have 1 site. I have an offsite office that connects via vpn to my site. I was going to put a distribution point out there and was considering a management point as well. Is it best practice to only have management points on you main lan at your primary site? Or would things be okay if I put a management point in my office that connects over vpn? Or should I consider a secondary site? Currently using 1610. I've never had to branch out from a single network, single building, so I don't have any experience with building out SCCM beyond that. Any help appreciated!
  9. I'm completely new to working with queries, so I'm not sure I fully get what you're saying here. I'll poke around in the queries criteria tab and see what I can work out.
  10. This is the query I'm running select SMS_R_System.ResourceId, SMS_R_System.ResourceType, SMS_R_System.Name, SMS_R_System.SMSUniqueIdentifier, SMS_R_System.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup, SMS_R_System.Client, SMS_G_System_SoftwareProduct.ProductName, SMS_G_System_SoftwareProduct.ProductVersion from SMS_R_System inner join SMS_G_System_SoftwareProduct on SMS_G_System_SoftwareProduct.ResourceId = SMS_R_System.ResourceId where SMS_G_System_SoftwareProduct.ProductName like "Imprivata Agent" Pretty basic query, and I'm pulling more information than I actually need. Looking at it further, it appears that 98% of the output is only showing two versions. Everyone device has one version across the board, and the second version is what is in add/remove programs. Only a small subset have 3 versions...I should have looked at a larger sample before posting. Still odd, as I would only expect to see the version in add/remove programs listed, and I haven't been able to find any reference to the other version anywhere on the machine.
  11. Hello all, I'm running some queries to find all devices that have a particular software product on them, and I'm getting some odd results. The issue that I am having is that when I run the query, I'm getting multiple product versions reported back. We have gone through several versions of the this software as it is updated pretty regularly, and all versions are reporting back in the query instead of just one, or the one that is actually installed. Only one version is shown in Add/Remove programs on the device as I would expect. Example: The device started with Program v1.1. Then Program v1.2 came out and we upgraded to it. Then Program v1.3 came out and we upgraded. When I run the query, it comes out showing all 3 versions, when I would expect it to show just 1. Ex: Computer1 Program v1.1 Computer1 Program v1.2 Computer1 Program v1.3 Could this be the result of stale data from previous software inventories? If so, what is the best method to clean that out? The computer only has 1 version installed, so stale data is the only thing I can think of that would cause this. Any help/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
  12. I'm also looking for information on this. How to do UEFI OSD but also have 32bit OSD. Right now, if I set my UEFI TS to my 64bit boot image, it breaks all my 32bit OSD... very annoying
  13. Hello, I'm trying to manually import an update into SCCM SUP. I have successfully imported the updated into the underlying WSUS server, and I can search and locate it there. But the update never makes it into SCCM. I've tried syncing with Microsoft Update (where I normally sync to), and "Do not synchronize from Microsoft Update or upstream data source" , neither sync will pull in that update. Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? Should I be pointing my SUP to WSUS directly? I read an older blog post that said to use the "Do not sync..." with manually imported updates, which is why I tried that. Any help is much appreciated SMSNewb
  14. I found this thread: https://www.windows-noob.com/forums/topic/13113-office-2013-updates-ridiculous-disk-usage/?hl=%2Boffice+%2Blanguages#entry50454 I checked WSUS proper and it was set to "Download updates in all languages, including new languages" My SCCM is only set to download English I didn't see any update/answers on the other thread. I was wondering if anyone had any additional information regarding this or is experiencing the issue themselves.
  • Create New...