Jump to content


bterhune

Established Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bterhune

  1. I'm having a strange issue with my SCCM 2012 R2 system after upgrading SCCM to build 1702 and the my Alpha client group to build 1703. I've tried cleaning the WSUS database and re-indexing SQL Server 2012 on the SCCM server. Those things went successfully but the error still remains. Its only on several clients? And I've troubleshot those WIndows 10 builds in several ways. The error I'm getting is: {736205EA-A73A-4196-BDDF-D530BC3180C0} 2017-05-08 21:33:22:340-0500 1 148 [AGENT_DETECTION_FAILED] 101 {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000} 0 8024000d CcmExec Failure Software Synchronization Windows Update Client failed to detect with error 0x8024000d The Windows update GUI gives the same 0X8024000d message. This doesn't seem to have affected any of the non-1703 builds on our campus. Has anyone had a similar issue and have ideas? Things I've tried: 1. Rebuilding WSUS 2. Eliminating SCUP third party updates 3. Re-indexing SQL Server 2012 4. Setting group policy to ignore WU in case its a dual patch issue (that did not help and I took it out of GP) Brad
  2. It sounds like you're saying this is a behavior on the client side that I'm not going to be able to disable through group policy or some other rule? I have maintenance windows set on the collections but that doesn't matter. I have evaluations set to occur on a schedule and deployment happens ASAP for various groups. I changed the evaluation times to a different time- later in the evening/early morning. Hopefully that will help. Anyone experience this problem and figured out how to get the clients to not cache local files ahead of deployment time? I really want all the updates to come from SCCM. Brad
  3. I have some automatic deployment rules set on SCCM 2012 that indicate to about 2,000 or so workstations to get their updates from the SCCM server and an additional distribution once a month. For the last two times that deadline rolled around I've saturated our Internet bandwidth with client calls out to Microsoft Update. I'm trying to figure out why these machines won't get them from the server? Here's a snippet of data from a locationservices.log on a malfunctioning client: <![LOG[successfully sent location services HTTP failure message.]LOG]!><time="08:41:05.452+300" date="10-20-2015" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="4328" file="ccmhttperror.cpp:396"> <![LOG[Error sending HEAD request. HTTP code 600, status '']LOG]!><time="08:41:05.452+300" date="10-20-2015" component="LocationServices" context="" type="3" thread="4328" file="util.cpp:2568"> <![LOG[Workgroup client is in Unknown location]LOG]!><time="08:41:05.452+300" date="10-20-2015" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="4328" file="lsad.cpp:1078"> <![LOG[Failed to send request to at host sccm2012.uthsc.tennessee.edu, error 0x2ee7]LOG]!><time="08:41:05.452+300" date="10-20-2015" component="LocationServices" context="" type="2" thread="4328" file="ccmhttpget.cpp:1871"> <![LOG[[CCMHTTP] ERROR: URL=http://sccm2012.uthsc.tennessee.edu, Port=80, Options=192, Code=12007, Text=ERROR_WINHTTP_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED]LOG]!><time="08:41:05.452+300" date="10-20-2015" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="4328" file="ccmhttperror.cpp:297"> <![LOG[Raising event: instance of CCM_CcmHttp_Status { ClientID = "GUID:1D5B6303-F62C-4655-87BB-60679730B062"; DateTime = "20151020134105.452000+000"; HostName = "sccm2012.uthsc.tennessee.edu"; HRESULT = "0x80072ee7"; ProcessID = 4932; StatusCode = 600; ThreadID = 4328; }; ]LOG]!><time="08:41:05.452+300" date="10-20-2015" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="4328" file="event.cpp:715"> <![LOG[successfully sent location services HTTP failure message.]LOG]!><time="08:41:05.468+300" date="10-20-2015" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="4328" file="ccmhttperror.cpp:396"> On that same client here's some data from the WUAHandler.log: <![LOG[Enabling WUA Managed server policy to use server: http://sccm2012.uthsc.tennessee.edu:8530]LOG]!><time="21:48:00.434+300" date="10-16-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2052" file="sourcemanager.cpp:948"> <![LOG[Waiting for 2 mins for Group Policy to notify of WUA policy change...]LOG]!><time="21:48:00.449+300" date="10-16-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2052" file="sourcemanager.cpp:954"> <![LOG[Timed out waiting for Group Policy notification.]LOG]!><time="21:50:00.459+300" date="10-16-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2052" file="sourcemanager.cpp:95"> <![LOG[unable to read existing WUA resultant policy. Error = 0x80070002.]LOG]!><time="21:50:00.459+300" date="10-16-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="2" thread="2052" file="sourcemanager.cpp:958"> <![LOG[Group policy settings were overwritten by a higher authority (Domain Controller) to: Server and Policy NOT CONFIGURED]LOG]!><time="21:50:00.459+300" date="10-16-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="3" thread="2052" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1013"> <![LOG[Failed to Add Update Source for WUAgent of type (2) and id ({EFF83188-7CB0-4536-8889-386EEA1D851E}). Error = 0x87d00692.]LOG]!><time="21:50:00.459+300" date="10-16-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="3" thread="2052" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2325"> <![LOG[CWuaHandler::SetCategoriesForStateReportingExclusion called with E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B;E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for leaves and E0789628-CE08-4437-BE74-2495B842F43B,A38C835C-2950-4E87-86CC-6911A52C34A3; for bundles]LOG]!><time="03:53:45.056+300" date="10-17-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="2208" file="cwuahandler.cpp:2527"> <![LOG[its a WSUS Update Source type ({EFF83188-7CB0-4536-8889-386EEA1D851E}), adding it.]LOG]!><time="07:50:58.996+300" date="10-19-2015" component="WUAHandler" context="" type="1" thread="4712" file="sourcemanager.cpp:1232"> Does anyone have advice regarding what I might look at? I'd love any direction that you all could provide. Cause I have no idea how to resolve it at this point. Brad Terhune
  4. Hey all. I've got an SCCM 2007 site currently in production. And I want to start doing some testing with a smaller subset of our computers here. I've setup LDAP queries in "System Discovery" to only find about 80 computers. However I don't think I can send the agent to the computers with out a boundary and boundary group to associate with the distribution point? Correct? When configuring the boundary I'm not able to create a boundary that only includes a small subset of our computer population. I could set it to be the entire domain, but I'm concerned I might somehow affect the rest of the SCCM 2007 systems? So, my question is . . . if I configure the boundary to be the entire domain of thousands of computers, but only have discovered about 80, am I taking a chance of upgrading the entire domain? Thanks. Brad
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.